this one might keep moving for a bit.
always a push-pull.
between something and nothing
caught between isolation,
and ceaseless sensing
of touching infinity and
violently recoiling
somewhere in between
falling and floating.
wanna feel real, play human
what really is contact?
words and messy sensation.
where thought meets |syntax|
am I the only person who wonders what it means to interact?
always hiding behind veils of propriety, careful correspondence.
follow the rules, step by step
formal principles, protocological conscience.
bounded by what we know to be true.
carefully aged and crafted consciousness.
dragging experiences behind us,
incessant daemons, eternal constants.
so much more than words,
these unwieldy layers of habit+context.
It is interesting to me how many layers and variations exist in instances of human connection or moments of mutual intelligibility, of how much (or how little?) actually takes place in human interaction.
In some interactions, conversation can be held entirely in the abstract. participants can appear to say nothing at all or nothing of substantial importance. and yet something is exchanged where words are not. some could say this is context, background knowledge, or shared experience or culture. while these are certainly factors in achieving mutual intelligibility, they are at times reductionist and cannot account for the situated complexity that takes place within interaction, as even when such categories are shared mutual intelligibility, genuine connection, can evade us in interaction. Paradoxically, none of these factors can be shared and mutual understanding can still effectively take place. These are merely surface level materialities that mask the peculiar nature of connection, understanding, meaning, itself.
Conversations can be guided by previous encounters, embodied moment, habituated thinking, and other intangible sublayers of experience. Most participants reciprocally and diligently invested in achieving mutual intelligibility, can overcome asymmetry in materially factored relatedness. Understanding, connection, meaning, is reciprocally forged through ongoing relatedness, dropping threads and picking up others, for the sake of concerted showing rather than telling.